The Joy Luck Clubs (JL) were once the most expensive movie tickets in America, and they were also one of the first private clubs in the country.
Now, they’re in a class of their own.
In 2017, a total of $300.5 million was donated to the groups cause, with $30 million going to the families of the victims.
These are the kinds of charities that should be celebrated and supported, but have instead been labeled as “dangerous and predatory.”
The most prominent example of this is the American Cancer Society.
The group donated more than $3 million to the Joy Locker, a private club where they encouraged people to go to their movies with the intent of “promoting the cause of cancer.”
In a statement released in 2018, the American Association of Cancer Directors said the club “was not a safe space” and was “dangerously associated with alcohol and violence, with sexual assault, with harassment, and with an unsafe working environment.”
But the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) says that the club was never “a safe space.”
According to the organization, it “may be unsafe in some cases, but the safety of staff, patrons, and guests was never the primary concern.”
The ASCE further states that “the club’s policy of no drinking or smoking was in direct contradiction to the ASCE’s Code of Conduct.”
The clubs own founder, James J. Bensoussan, is also a member of the ASSE.
Bresenas daughter, Amanda, also sits on the board of the organization.
She is also the owner of the company that owns the JoyLocker, the company with the “largest membership in the U.S.” and the largest annual profit.
Amanda Bresens involvement with the club is also well-documented.
In 2018, The New York Times published an article detailing her ties to the club.
According to The Times, Bresins daughter Amanda “is a founding member of JL.
Her father, who owns the club, has described her as his “heart and soul.”
Amanda Bremenas brother, Scott, is the current chair of the board.
Bremens sister, Amanda and Bresons brother Scott sit on the executive board.
The New Yorker reports that Amanda B Resens involvement in the club has led to a conflict of interest with her father, and has been a source of concern to many in the organization who were uncomfortable with her role as chair.
The organization is owned by her father.
Amanda is also listed on a “non-disclosure agreement” that she signed with her brother Scott in June 2018.
According the New Yorker, the agreement stated that “if I violate any of the terms of the agreement, the trustees may terminate my relationship with the company.”
Amanda Resens brother, Robert, also owns the company.
The terms of this agreement have also been a major source of contention with some members of the JL board.
In August 2018, an article published in the Wall Street Journal reported that the board members were discussing how to remove the board member who “had a conflict with the JLCs management,” including that of Bresis brother, and that Robert Bresenson was also interested in joining the board as a director.
This is the same Robert B Resenson who is currently serving as a board member of a group called the Foundation for a Better America (FFA).
The JL also has a history of misusing funds and the proceeds of the movie theater, according to a lawsuit filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union.
The lawsuit, filed by former employees of the theater, alleges that the JLA’s “policy of ‘going for broke’ resulted in thousands of dollars in excess profits being siphoned from the organization and used to purchase luxury items such as luxury cars, jewelry, and other luxury items.”
In 2018 alone, the Jl spent nearly $3.5 and $2.4 million, respectively, on its lavish lifestyle, according the lawsuit.
The Jl has since been ordered by the city of Los Angeles to pay nearly $1 million to a group of former employees, the Los Angeles Times reported.
The city of New York also has since ordered the Jlam to pay $1.5m to former employees.
JL has also been sued for failing to properly supervise employees, including a former employee who allegedly threatened another employee with a gun when he tried to intervene in a sexual harassment case.
In the suit, the former employee alleged that he was retaliated against for reporting sexual harassment at the JCL.
The suit claims that JL officials were aware of the threats, but failed to take action.
Jlam officials have said that they are cooperating with the federal investigation.
But the lawsuit continues to call for action.
The attorney representing the former JL employee who filed the lawsuit told The New Republic that he has no problem with the organization taking steps to prevent